A more detailed version taking into account the new discoveries will appear soon.
Since Caesar established the provinces of Gallia Lugdunensis and Gallia Belgica west of the Rhine in about 50 BC, the German tribes had developed a habit to cross the river and raid the richer places along the border. To put an end to this, Nero Claudius Drusus the Elder (known as Drusus) and Tiberius Claudius Nero (Tiberius) led several campaigns into the lands of the Cherusci and Chatti and pushed as far as the Elbe (Albis) between 16 and 9 BC. They managed to play the tribes and families against each other, and for some years it looked like Germania Transrhenania could become a Roman province.
First announcements of the find were made in 2004. The existence of walls was known earlier since they stood out in the landscape, but they were thought to have been an Iron Age hill fort until diggings by Klaus Grote of the Archaelogical Seminar Göttingen brought to light a number of Roman artefacts like pioneer axes (dolabrae), iron spear points (both hasta and pilum type), parts of horse harnesses, a broken gladius sword, and coins dating from the time of Drusus' German campaign. Grote and his assistants also found the remains of stone foundations for storage houses and discovered there were actually four forts, the main one used for storage and probably as garrison, the others as marching camps with less permanent structures (the soldiers may have lived in tents; there were a number of iron tent pegs among the finds).
Most of the buidlings and fortifications were made of timber, and conditions have not preserved much of that aside from post holes. The first version of Roman forts often were timber structures, even those later reconstructed in stone like Vindolanda - only the conditions in Vindolanda have preserved more of the wood. So what we do have are stone foundations, supposedly of storage houses and maybe other buildings (there seem to be two different sorts of foundation remains, one more crafted and fixed with mortar, and one that looks more like loose stones roughly hewn).
Size, structure and strategical position and the already unearthed details within the walled ground of fort 1 (diggings are still going on) make it clear that it was a supply camp, intended to store foodstuffs (grain, salt, cattle) and replacement material for armour and weapons as well as fabricae (repair workshops) for the legions involved in the area. There may also have been a lazarett. A logistic centre like this was an important factor in organising the supplies.
The second function of the fort was the guard and control of the Werra ford and the crossroads meeting there.
See also Weapons found at Hedemünden.
~shivers~
ReplyDeleteGood point about the geographic imperatives, Gabriele.
That definitely goes for Kalkriese, looking from the tower at a place where some 10,000 Romans died (more already had died by guerilla attacks during the previous two days march towards the final trap) makes one feel uneasy and moved.
ReplyDeleteBut there is no proof, archaeological or in Roman sources, that any major fighting took place near Hedemünden.
How could the Romans possibly have kept the garrison at Hedemunden supplied with food?
ReplyDelete